KARAOKE SCENE MAGAZINE ONLINE! - The Validity Of SCDG's? Public Forums Karaoke Discussions Karaoke Legalities & Piracy, etc... Karaoke Scene's Karaoke Forums Home | Contact Us | Site Map  

Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene

   
  * Login
  * Register

  * FAQ
  * Search

Custom Search

Social Networks


premium-member

Offsite Links


It is currently Fri Jan 10, 2025 3:09 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2013 1:39 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster

Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am
Posts: 6103
Been Liked: 634 times
8) Check this out Bruce this is what CAVS emailed me.

Call this number 1-562-777-1846

"We will enlighten you on this racketeering scam". I guess they are keeping it in the RICO vein.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2013 3:45 pm 
Offline
Novice Poster
Novice Poster

Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 2:33 pm
Posts: 43
Been Liked: 12 times
Just read the document on Pacer. Karaoke Kandy Store aka Light Year Music just won a jury decision against Slep-Tone. A jury unanimously decided that their was no Trademark Infringement in this case. What you talkin' bout Willis?


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2013 4:21 pm 
Offline
Super Duper Poster
Super Duper Poster

Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 10:03 pm
Posts: 2674
Location: Jersey
Been Liked: 160 times
The Lone Ranger wrote:
8) Check this out Bruce this is what CAVS emailed me.

Call this number 1-562-777-1846

"We will enlighten you on this racketeering scam". I guess they are keeping it in the RICO vein.


Someone must have removed whatever it was that you posted. I tend to believe you're right on the money on this one and I don't have to call someone to verify what you're posting. If a Jury has finally decided that media shifting, and maybe even out and out piracy of the Sound Choice product, still isn't considered Trade Mark infringement; then I guess Sound Choice will be looking for "PLAN C" to try to make some money without having to produce any new karaoke tracks


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2013 8:57 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster

Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am
Posts: 6103
Been Liked: 634 times
djjeffross wrote:
Just read the document on Pacer. Karaoke Kandy Store aka Light Year Music just won a jury decision against Slep-Tone. A jury unanimously decided that their was no Trademark Infringement in this case. What you talkin' bout Willis?


8) I just wish someone who has a pacer account would provide the documents for this verdict here and on the Free Forum for everyone to see. If this verdict could be confirmed it would go a long way to putting every hosts fears about the manus to rest. It would also prove beyond a doubt that a big scam has been worked on the karaoke community for the last 4 years.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:48 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster

Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am
Posts: 6103
Been Liked: 634 times
8) I did manage to find some links that back up the claim that SC did indeed lose a jury trial to Light Year Music aka The Kandy Store.

http://soundchoicelasvegaslawsuit.com/w ... mment-5486

I'm having trouble posting the proper link for documents of the decision, they are posted on the Free Forum, however, under the thread PRLLC and Digitrax Audits page 3. It was posted by Insane KJ.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 2:40 pm 
Offline
Novice Poster
Novice Poster

Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 2:33 pm
Posts: 43
Been Liked: 12 times
The Lone Ranger wrote:
djjeffross wrote:
Just read the document on Pacer. Karaoke Kandy Store aka Light Year Music just won a jury decision against Slep-Tone. A jury unanimously decided that their was no Trademark Infringement in this case. What you talkin' bout Willis?


8) I just wish someone who has a pacer account would provide the documents for this verdict here and on the Free Forum for everyone to see. If this verdict could be confirmed it would go a long way to putting every hosts fears about the manus to rest. It would also prove beyond a doubt that a big scam has been worked on the karaoke community for the last 4 years.


This is the best I could converting the PDF to text. But you get the point ...



UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION

SLEP- TONE ENTERTAINMENT )
CORPORATION, )
)
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. )
)
KARAOKE KANDY STORE, INC., )
et al., )
)
Defendants. )

CASE NO. 1:10 CV 990

JUDGE DONALD C. NUGENT

JUDGMENT

The above-captioned case came before this Court for a trial by jury. At the conclusion of the trial, the Jury returned a unanimous Answer to an Interrogatory in favor of Defendants, Karaoke Kandy Store, Inc. and Charles M. Polidori.
In its Complaint, Plaintiff Slep-Tone Entertainment Corp., asserted claims of trademark

infringement under federal and Ohio law, unfair competition under federal law and violation of the Ohio Deceptive Trade Practices Act all based upon Defendants' alleged infringement of Plaintiff's "Sound Choice" trademarks.
The trial commenced on August 19,2013. A Jury of twelve was duly impaneled and

sworn pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 39(c)(I). Opening statements of counsel were made. Plaintiff called the following witness(es): (1) Kurt Slep; and (2) Robert Shumaker. Court was then adjourned until August 20,2013 at 8:15 am.
The trial continued on August 20,2013. Plaintiff called the following witness(es): (3)

Jeff DeLeva; Defendants call witness: (1) Robert D. Martin (out of order); (3) Jeff DeLeva, continued; (4) Charles Polidori (on cross-examination). Court was then adjourned until August
21,2013 at 8:15 a.m.

The trial continued on August 21, 2013. Plaintiff called the following witness( es): (4) Charles Polidori, continued. Defendants call the following witness(es): (2) James DeRoach; (3) Joseph Polidori, Sr.; (4) Charles Polidori. Defendants rested. Court was then adjourned until August 22,2013 at 8:15 am.
The trial continued on August 22, 2013. Plaintiff called the following witness(es): (5) Steve Martel; (6);David Sems. Plaintiff rested. The Court instructs jury on the law. Closing arguments of counsel were made and the Court gave final instructions. Thereafter, the Jury retired to deliberate. The Jury, in open court, returned the following unanimous Answer to the Interrogatory:
INTERROGATORY NUMBER 1

Do you find that Plaintiff proved by a preponderance of the evidence that Defendants infringed on Plaintiff's
trademark( s)?

NO (insert in ink "YES" or "NO" according to your findings)

The Court read the Interrogatory Answer in open court, and thereafter, the Court polled the Jury. Each Juror affirmatively responded to the correctness of the Answer. The Court accepted the Interrogatory Answer and the Jury was then discharged.
THEREFORE, based upon the Interrogatory Answer, and the evidence presented at trial, the

Court enters Judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in favor of the Defendants Karaoke Kandy Store, Inc. and Charles M. Polidori on Plaintiff's Complaint. All costs are to be paid by the Plaintiff.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATE: ~ J..\ ).on


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:21 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:55 am
Posts: 3885
Images: 0
Been Liked: 397 times
Just another Brick In The Wall.


Or nail in the coffin, as it were.

_________________
I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 7:55 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster

Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am
Posts: 6103
Been Liked: 634 times
djjeffross wrote:
The Lone Ranger wrote:
djjeffross wrote:
Just read the document on Pacer. Karaoke Kandy Store aka Light Year Music just won a jury decision against Slep-Tone. A jury unanimously decided that their was no Trademark Infringement in this case. What you talkin' bout Willis?


8) I just wish someone who has a pacer account would provide the documents for this verdict here and on the Free Forum for everyone to see. If this verdict could be confirmed it would go a long way to putting every hosts fears about the manus to rest. It would also prove beyond a doubt that a big scam has been worked on the karaoke community for the last 4 years.


This is the best I could converting the PDF to text. But you get the point ...



UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION

SLEP- TONE ENTERTAINMENT )
CORPORATION, )
)
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. )
)
KARAOKE KANDY STORE, INC., )
et al., )
)
Defendants. )

CASE NO. 1:10 CV 990

JUDGE DONALD C. NUGENT

JUDGMENT

The above-captioned case came before this Court for a trial by jury. At the conclusion of the trial, the Jury returned a unanimous Answer to an Interrogatory in favor of Defendants, Karaoke Kandy Store, Inc. and Charles M. Polidori.
In its Complaint, Plaintiff Slep-Tone Entertainment Corp., asserted claims of trademark

infringement under federal and Ohio law, unfair competition under federal law and violation of the Ohio Deceptive Trade Practices Act all based upon Defendants' alleged infringement of Plaintiff's "Sound Choice" trademarks.
The trial commenced on August 19,2013. A Jury of twelve was duly impaneled and

sworn pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 39(c)(I). Opening statements of counsel were made. Plaintiff called the following witness(es): (1) Kurt Slep; and (2) Robert Shumaker. Court was then adjourned until August 20,2013 at 8:15 am.
The trial continued on August 20,2013. Plaintiff called the following witness(es): (3)

Jeff DeLeva; Defendants call witness: (1) Robert D. Martin (out of order); (3) Jeff DeLeva, continued; (4) Charles Polidori (on cross-examination). Court was then adjourned until August
21,2013 at 8:15 a.m.

The trial continued on August 21, 2013. Plaintiff called the following witness( es): (4) Charles Polidori, continued. Defendants call the following witness(es): (2) James DeRoach; (3) Joseph Polidori, Sr.; (4) Charles Polidori. Defendants rested. Court was then adjourned until August 22,2013 at 8:15 am.
The trial continued on August 22, 2013. Plaintiff called the following witness(es): (5) Steve Martel; (6);David Sems. Plaintiff rested. The Court instructs jury on the law. Closing arguments of counsel were made and the Court gave final instructions. Thereafter, the Jury retired to deliberate. The Jury, in open court, returned the following unanimous Answer to the Interrogatory:
INTERROGATORY NUMBER 1

Do you find that Plaintiff proved by a preponderance of the evidence that Defendants infringed on Plaintiff's
trademark( s)?

NO (insert in ink "YES" or "NO" according to your findings)

The Court read the Interrogatory Answer in open court, and thereafter, the Court polled the Jury. Each Juror affirmatively responded to the correctness of the Answer. The Court accepted the Interrogatory Answer and the Jury was then discharged.
THEREFORE, based upon the Interrogatory Answer, and the evidence presented at trial, the

Court enters Judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in favor of the Defendants Karaoke Kandy Store, Inc. and Charles M. Polidori on Plaintiff's Complaint. All costs are to be paid by the Plaintiff.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATE: ~ J..\ ).on


8) Thanks so much for giving us the information, you are very much liked.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 141 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Privacy Policy | Anti-Spam Policy | Acceptable Use Policy Copyright © Karaoke Scene Magazine
design & hosting by Cross Web Tech